China, Macao SAR vs Samoa: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual

China, Macao SAR
-1.16 % change on previous year
in 2024
Samoa
-1.21 % change on previous year
in 2024
China, Macao SAR rank
130th
Samoa rank
131st

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time

  • China, Macao SAR
  • Samoa
-50050100150200196219932024

How they compare

China, Macao SAR currently reports -1.16 % change on previous year against -1.21 % change on previous year in Samoa, a difference of 0.05 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 32 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was China, Macao SAR ahead.

China, Macao SAR ranks 130th and Samoa ranks 131st of 209 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China, Macao SAR averaged higher in 3 and Samoa in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Macao SAR Samoa Difference Ahead
1960s 26.13 % change on previous year 9.15 % change on previous year 16.98 % change on previous year China, Macao SAR
1970s 12.7 % change on previous year 2.88 % change on previous year 9.82 % change on previous year China, Macao SAR
1980s 24.38 % change on previous year 3.83 % change on previous year 20.55 % change on previous year China, Macao SAR
1990s 1.06 % change on previous year 1.15 % change on previous year 0.0937 % change on previous year Samoa
2000s -0.9425 % change on previous year 3.03 % change on previous year 3.97 % change on previous year Samoa
2010s -1.53 % change on previous year 0.5005 % change on previous year 2.03 % change on previous year Samoa
2020s -0.2073 % change on previous year 0.5019 % change on previous year 0.7092 % change on previous year Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, China, Macao SAR or Samoa?
China, Macao SAR, at -1.16 % change on previous year against -1.21 % change on previous year in Samoa as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between China, Macao SAR and Samoa?
0.05 % change on previous year, with China, Macao SAR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Macao SAR and Samoa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do China, Macao SAR and Samoa rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
China, Macao SAR ranks 130th and Samoa ranks 131st of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Macao SAR vs Samoa: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/china-macao-sar/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/china-macao-sar/samoa/">China, Macao SAR vs Samoa: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,385 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.