Chile vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual

Chile
5.54 % change on previous year
in 2024
Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
5.91 % change on previous year
in 2017
Chile rank
40th
Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank
38th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time

  • Chile
  • Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
-250255075100196219932024

How they compare

Netherlands (Kingdom of the) currently reports 5.91 % change on previous year against 5.54 % change on previous year in Chile, a difference of 0.37 % change on previous year.

That makes Netherlands (Kingdom of the)'s figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 20 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.

Chile ranks 40th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 38th of 209 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Netherlands (Kingdom of the) Difference Ahead
1960s 1.87 % change on previous year 4.24 % change on previous year 2.36 % change on previous year Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
1970s 4.07 % change on previous year 4.4 % change on previous year 0.3271 % change on previous year Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
1980s 3.15 % change on previous year 0.8512 % change on previous year 2.3 % change on previous year Chile
1990s 0.5667 % change on previous year 0.6472 % change on previous year 0.0805 % change on previous year Netherlands (Kingdom of the)
2000s -0.5273 % change on previous year -1.99 % change on previous year 1.46 % change on previous year Chile
2010s -0.2529 % change on previous year 1.24 % change on previous year 1.49 % change on previous year Netherlands (Kingdom of the)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Chile or Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
Netherlands (Kingdom of the), at 5.91 % change on previous year against 5.54 % change on previous year in Chile as of 2017.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Chile and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
0.37 % change on previous year, with Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Netherlands (Kingdom of the)?
56 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2017.
How do Chile and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
Chile ranks 40th and Netherlands (Kingdom of the) ranks 38th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/chile/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/chile/netherlands-kingdom-of-the/">Chile vs Netherlands (Kingdom of the): Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,385 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.