Brazil vs Middle Africa: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual

Brazil
14.23 % change on previous year
in 2024
Middle Africa
3.55 % change on previous year
in 2024
Brazil rank
11th
Middle Africa rank
10th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time

  • Brazil
  • Middle Africa
-20-1001020196219932024

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 14.23 % change on previous year against 3.55 % change on previous year in Middle Africa, a difference of 10.68 % change on previous year.

That makes Brazil's figure about 4.0 times Middle Africa's.

The two have swapped places 33 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Middle Africa ahead.

Brazil ranks 11th and Middle Africa ranks 10th of 209 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 4 and Middle Africa in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Middle Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 3.77 % change on previous year 2.68 % change on previous year 1.09 % change on previous year Brazil
1970s 3.98 % change on previous year 4.51 % change on previous year 0.5267 % change on previous year Middle Africa
1980s 4.8 % change on previous year 4.4 % change on previous year 0.4069 % change on previous year Brazil
1990s 4.41 % change on previous year 3.57 % change on previous year 0.8452 % change on previous year Brazil
2000s 0.6773 % change on previous year 3.73 % change on previous year 3.06 % change on previous year Middle Africa
2010s 2.59 % change on previous year 3.04 % change on previous year 0.443 % change on previous year Middle Africa
2020s 4.81 % change on previous year 3.9 % change on previous year 0.9046 % change on previous year Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Brazil or Middle Africa?
Brazil, at 14.23 % change on previous year against 3.55 % change on previous year in Middle Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Brazil and Middle Africa?
10.68 % change on previous year, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Middle Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Brazil and Middle Africa rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
Brazil ranks 11th and Middle Africa ranks 10th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Middle Africa: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/brazil/middle-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/brazil/middle-africa/">Brazil vs Middle Africa: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,385 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.