Bahamas vs Congo: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual

Bahamas
-0.8929 % change on previous year
in 2024
Congo
-0.8448 % change on previous year
in 2024
Bahamas rank
127th
Congo rank
126th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time

  • Bahamas
  • Congo
-40-2002040196219932024

How they compare

Congo currently reports -0.8448 % change on previous year against -0.8929 % change on previous year in Bahamas, a difference of 0.0481 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 28 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Congo ahead.

Bahamas ranks 127th and Congo ranks 126th of 209 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bahamas averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Congo Difference Ahead
1960s -1.45 % change on previous year 19.53 % change on previous year 20.98 % change on previous year Congo
1970s -8.6 % change on previous year 8.1 % change on previous year 16.7 % change on previous year Congo
1980s -2.01 % change on previous year -4.94 % change on previous year 2.93 % change on previous year Bahamas
1990s -2.33 % change on previous year 2 % change on previous year 4.34 % change on previous year Congo
2000s 1.67 % change on previous year 14.8 % change on previous year 13.13 % change on previous year Congo
2010s -0.1058 % change on previous year 0.0103 % change on previous year 0.1161 % change on previous year Congo
2020s -1.27 % change on previous year -0.7323 % change on previous year 0.5377 % change on previous year Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Bahamas or Congo?
Congo, at -0.8448 % change on previous year against -0.8929 % change on previous year in Bahamas as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Bahamas and Congo?
0.0481 % change on previous year, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Congo?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Bahamas and Congo rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
Bahamas ranks 127th and Congo ranks 126th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Congo: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/bahamas-the/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-production-annual-growth-rate/bahamas-the/congo-rep/">Bahamas vs Congo: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,385 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.