Australia and New Zealand vs Sri Lanka: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 10.31 % change on previous year against 9.42 % change on previous year in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.89 % change on previous year.
That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 34 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 20th and Sri Lanka ranks 21st of 209 countries.
Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.47 % change on previous year | 3.87 % change on previous year | 1.59 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1970s | 6.87 % change on previous year | -3.08 % change on previous year | 9.95 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1980s | -1.37 % change on previous year | -1.37 % change on previous year | 0.0029 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1990s | 2.03 % change on previous year | 1.75 % change on previous year | 0.2792 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2000s | 0.8022 % change on previous year | 0.0577 % change on previous year | 0.7445 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2010s | 1.54 % change on previous year | -0.244 % change on previous year | 1.78 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 2020s | 1.47 % change on previous year | 0.1208 % change on previous year | 1.35 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Australia and New Zealand or Sri Lanka?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 10.31 % change on previous year against 9.42 % change on previous year in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Australia and New Zealand and Sri Lanka?
- 0.89 % change on previous year, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Sri Lanka?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Sri Lanka rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 20th and Sri Lanka ranks 21st of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.