Australia and New Zealand vs Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs): Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual over time
- Australia and New Zealand
- Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
How they compare
Australia and New Zealand currently reports 10.31 % change on previous year against 1.44 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), a difference of 8.87 % change on previous year.
That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 7.2 times Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s.
The two have swapped places 24 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Australia and New Zealand ahead.
Australia and New Zealand ranks 20th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 22nd of 209 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Australia and New Zealand averaged higher in 2 and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia and New Zealand | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.47 % change on previous year | 2.2 % change on previous year | 3.26 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1970s | 6.87 % change on previous year | 2.6 % change on previous year | 4.28 % change on previous year | Australia and New Zealand |
| 1980s | -1.37 % change on previous year | 2.02 % change on previous year | 3.39 % change on previous year | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 1990s | 2.03 % change on previous year | 14.02 % change on previous year | 11.99 % change on previous year | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 2000s | 0.8022 % change on previous year | 2.28 % change on previous year | 1.48 % change on previous year | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 2010s | 1.54 % change on previous year | 3.4 % change on previous year | 1.87 % change on previous year | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
| 2020s | 1.47 % change on previous year | 2.29 % change on previous year | 0.8228 % change on previous year | Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual, Australia and New Zealand or Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
- Australia and New Zealand, at 10.31 % change on previous year against 1.44 % change on previous year in Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) as of 2024.
- What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual between Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
- 8.87 % change on previous year, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
- How do Australia and New Zealand and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — production, annual?
- Australia and New Zealand ranks 20th and Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 22nd of 209 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Production. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.