New Caledonia vs Timor-Leste: Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered

New Caledonia
13,393 An
in 2024
Timor-Leste
13,342 An
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
193rd
Timor-Leste rank
194th

Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered over time

  • New Caledonia
  • Timor-Leste
5.0k10.0k15.0k20.0k25.0k196119922024

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 13,393 An against 13,342 An in Timor-Leste, a difference of 51 An.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 193rd and Timor-Leste ranks 194th of 250 countries.

New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia Timor-Leste Difference Ahead
1960s 19,177 An 5,760 An 13,417 An New Caledonia
1970s 17,826 An 7,875 An 9,951 An New Caledonia
1980s 15,261 An 5,880 An 9,381 An New Caledonia
1990s 21,230 An 9,498 An 11,732 An New Caledonia
2000s 19,388 An 10,993 An 8,395 An New Caledonia
2010s 16,761 An 12,266 An 4,495 An New Caledonia
2020s 14,069 An 13,404 An 665.2 An New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, New Caledonia or Timor-Leste?
New Caledonia, at 13,393 An against 13,342 An in Timor-Leste as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between New Caledonia and Timor-Leste?
51 An, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and Timor-Leste?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do New Caledonia and Timor-Leste rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
New Caledonia ranks 193rd and Timor-Leste ranks 194th of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs Timor-Leste: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/new-caledonia/timor-leste-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/new-caledonia/timor-leste-2/">New Caledonia vs Timor-Leste: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,946 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.