Micronesia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered

Micronesia
1,817 An
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
1,937 An
in 2024
Micronesia rank
232nd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
229th

Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered over time

  • Micronesia
  • Sao Tome and Principe
5001.0k1.5k2.0k196119922024

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 1,937 An against 1,817 An in Micronesia, a difference of 120 An.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Micronesia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Micronesia ahead.

Micronesia ranks 232nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 229th of 250 countries.

Micronesia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Micronesia Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 1,803 An 571.67 An 1,232 An Micronesia
2000s 1,806 An 684 An 1,122 An Micronesia
2010s 1,753 An 933.6 An 819.7 An Micronesia
2020s 1,803 An 1,548 An 254.8 An Micronesia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Micronesia or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 1,937 An against 1,817 An in Micronesia as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Micronesia and Sao Tome and Principe?
120 An, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia and Sao Tome and Principe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Micronesia and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Micronesia ranks 232nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 229th of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Micronesia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/micronesia/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/micronesia/sao-tome-and-principe/">Micronesia vs Sao Tome and Principe: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,946 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.