Iceland vs Papua New Guinea: Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered

Iceland
22,453 An
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
21,543 An
in 2024
Iceland rank
182nd
Papua New Guinea rank
184th

Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered over time

  • Iceland
  • Papua New Guinea
010.0k20.0k30.0k40.0k196119922024

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 22,453 An against 21,543 An in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 910 An.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 182nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 184th of 250 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 6 and Papua New Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 36,382 An 6,167 An 30,215 An Iceland
1970s 34,337 An 14,067 An 20,270 An Iceland
1980s 25,843 An 14,250 An 11,593 An Iceland
1990s 23,822 An 15,730 An 8,092 An Iceland
2000s 21,217 An 20,540 An 677.2 An Iceland
2010s 21,370 An 21,449 An 79.2 An Papua New Guinea
2020s 22,640 An 21,378 An 1,262 An Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Iceland or Papua New Guinea?
Iceland, at 22,453 An against 21,543 An in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Iceland and Papua New Guinea?
910 An, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Papua New Guinea?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Iceland and Papua New Guinea rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Iceland ranks 182nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 184th of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Papua New Guinea: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/iceland/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/iceland/papua-new-guinea/">Iceland vs Papua New Guinea: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,946 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.