Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered

Eswatini
79,676 An
in 2024
Guinea-Bissau
67,665 An
in 2024
Eswatini rank
163rd
Guinea-Bissau rank
166th

Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered over time

  • Eswatini
  • Guinea-Bissau
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k196119922024

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 79,676 An against 67,665 An in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 12,011 An.

That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.2 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 163rd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 166th of 250 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1960s 49,739 An 17,000 An 32,739 An Eswatini
1970s 62,802 An 18,600 An 44,202 An Eswatini
1980s 66,683 An 23,480 An 43,203 An Eswatini
1990s 58,937 An 35,640 An 23,297 An Eswatini
2000s 62,918 An 47,917 An 15,001 An Eswatini
2010s 67,788 An 60,701 An 7,087 An Eswatini
2020s 70,611 An 65,161 An 5,450 An Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Eswatini or Guinea-Bissau?
Eswatini, at 79,676 An against 67,665 An in Guinea-Bissau as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau?
12,011 An, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Eswatini ranks 163rd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 166th of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/eswatini/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/eswatini/guinea-bissau/">Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,946 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.