El Salvador vs Namibia: Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered

El Salvador
115,831 An
in 2024
Namibia
114,187 An
in 2024
El Salvador rank
156th
Namibia rank
157th

Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered over time

  • El Salvador
  • Namibia
50.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k196119922024

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 115,831 An against 114,187 An in Namibia, a difference of 1,644 An.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 156th and Namibia ranks 157th of 250 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 4 and Namibia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 135,289 An 103,489 An 31,800 An El Salvador
1970s 175,721 An 149,275 An 26,446 An El Salvador
1980s 150,506 An 165,846 An 15,339 An Namibia
1990s 170,119 An 196,061 An 25,942 An Namibia
2000s 191,136 An 187,655 An 3,481 An El Salvador
2010s 126,393 An 132,958 An 6,565 An Namibia
2020s 113,503 An 109,702 An 3,802 An El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, El Salvador or Namibia?
El Salvador, at 115,831 An against 114,187 An in Namibia as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between El Salvador and Namibia?
1,644 An, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Namibia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do El Salvador and Namibia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
El Salvador ranks 156th and Namibia ranks 157th of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Namibia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/el-salvador/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/el-salvador/namibia/">El Salvador vs Namibia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,946 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.