Cuba vs Finland: Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered

Cuba
300,000 An
in 2024
Finland
264,220 An
in 2024
Cuba rank
123rd
Finland rank
126th

Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered over time

  • Cuba
  • Finland
250.0k500.0k750.0k1.0M1.2M196119922024

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 300,000 An against 264,220 An in Finland, a difference of 35,780 An.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.

Cuba ranks 123rd and Finland ranks 126th of 250 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Finland Difference Ahead
1960s 1.02 million An 957,811 An 67,067 An Cuba
1970s 950,090 An 747,580 An 202,510 An Cuba
1980s 903,743 An 605,790 An 297,953 An Cuba
1990s 571,307 An 435,910 An 135,397 An Cuba
2000s 415,309 An 318,979 An 96,330 An Cuba
2010s 441,980 An 275,497 An 166,483 An Cuba
2020s 351,374 An 262,498 An 88,876 An Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Cuba or Finland?
Cuba, at 300,000 An against 264,220 An in Finland as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Cuba and Finland?
35,780 An, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Finland?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Cuba and Finland rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Cuba ranks 123rd and Finland ranks 126th of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Finland: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/cuba/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/cuba/finland/">Cuba vs Finland: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,946 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.