China, Hong Kong SAR vs Luxembourg: Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered

China, Hong Kong SAR
21,642 An
in 2024
Luxembourg
25,270 An
in 2024
China, Hong Kong SAR rank
183rd
Luxembourg rank
181st

Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered over time

  • China, Hong Kong SAR
  • Luxembourg
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k250.0k196119922024

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 25,270 An against 21,642 An in China, Hong Kong SAR, a difference of 3,628 An.

That makes Luxembourg's figure about 1.2 times China, Hong Kong SAR's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was China, Hong Kong SAR ahead.

China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 183rd and Luxembourg ranks 181st of 250 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, China, Hong Kong SAR averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China, Hong Kong SAR Luxembourg Difference Ahead
2000s 44,205 An 30,036 An 14,170 An China, Hong Kong SAR
2010s 24,544 An 25,523 An 978.8 An Luxembourg
2020s 21,993 An 26,922 An 4,929 An Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, China, Hong Kong SAR or Luxembourg?
Luxembourg, at 25,270 An against 21,642 An in China, Hong Kong SAR as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between China, Hong Kong SAR and Luxembourg?
3,628 An, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China, Hong Kong SAR and Luxembourg?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do China, Hong Kong SAR and Luxembourg rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
China, Hong Kong SAR ranks 183rd and Luxembourg ranks 181st of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China, Hong Kong SAR vs Luxembourg: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/china-hong-kong-sar/luxembourg/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/china-hong-kong-sar/luxembourg/">China, Hong Kong SAR vs Luxembourg: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,946 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.