Chad vs New Zealand: Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered

Chad
4.34 million An
in 2024
New Zealand
4.68 million An
in 2024
Chad rank
20th
New Zealand rank
18th

Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered over time

  • Chad
  • New Zealand
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M5.0M196119922024

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 4.68 million An against 4.34 million An in Chad, a difference of 339,580 An.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Chad's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 20th and New Zealand ranks 18th of 250 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 264,778 An 2.57 million An 2.30 million An New Zealand
1970s 325,800 An 3.28 million An 2.96 million An New Zealand
1980s 668,300 An 3.02 million An 2.35 million An New Zealand
1990s 1.12 million An 3.25 million An 2.13 million An New Zealand
2000s 1.88 million An 3.70 million An 1.82 million An New Zealand
2010s 3.12 million An 4.27 million An 1.15 million An New Zealand
2020s 4.27 million An 4.65 million An 385,132 An New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Chad or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 4.68 million An against 4.34 million An in Chad as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Chad and New Zealand?
339,580 An, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and New Zealand?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Chad and New Zealand rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Chad ranks 20th and New Zealand ranks 18th of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs New Zealand: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/chad/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/chad/new-zealand/">Chad vs New Zealand: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,946 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.