Cape Verde vs Solomon Islands: Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered

Cape Verde
4,467 An
in 2024
Solomon Islands
4,174 An
in 2024
Cape Verde rank
218th
Solomon Islands rank
220th

Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Solomon Islands
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922024

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 4,467 An against 4,174 An in Solomon Islands, a difference of 293 An.

That makes Cape Verde's figure about 1.1 times Solomon Islands's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 218th and Solomon Islands ranks 220th of 250 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 4 and Solomon Islands in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 1,356 An 1,240 An 115.44 An Cape Verde
1970s 1,890 An 3,872 An 1,982 An Solomon Islands
1980s 1,880 An 4,385 An 2,505 An Solomon Islands
1990s 2,926 An 3,300 An 373.8 An Solomon Islands
2000s 4,535 An 3,690 An 845 An Cape Verde
2010s 4,087 An 4,058 An 28.8 An Cape Verde
2020s 4,447 An 4,137 An 310.8 An Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Cape Verde or Solomon Islands?
Cape Verde, at 4,467 An against 4,174 An in Solomon Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Cape Verde and Solomon Islands?
293 An, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Solomon Islands?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Cape Verde and Solomon Islands rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Cape Verde ranks 218th and Solomon Islands ranks 220th of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Solomon Islands: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/cabo-verde/solomon-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/cabo-verde/solomon-islands/">Cape Verde vs Solomon Islands: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,946 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.