Bulgaria vs Namibia: Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered

Bulgaria
116,570 An
in 2024
Namibia
114,187 An
in 2024
Bulgaria rank
155th
Namibia rank
157th

Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered over time

  • Bulgaria
  • Namibia
0200.0k400.0k600.0k196119922024

How they compare

Bulgaria currently reports 116,570 An against 114,187 An in Namibia, a difference of 2,383 An.

The two have swapped places 12 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bulgaria ahead.

Bulgaria ranks 155th and Namibia ranks 157th of 250 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bulgaria averaged higher in 6 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bulgaria Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 465,069 An 103,489 An 361,581 An Bulgaria
1970s 486,293 An 149,275 An 337,018 An Bulgaria
1980s 650,245 An 165,846 An 484,399 An Bulgaria
1990s 458,460 An 196,061 An 262,399 An Bulgaria
2000s 185,544 An 187,655 An 2,111 An Namibia
2010s 136,565 An 132,958 An 3,607 An Bulgaria
2020s 115,854 An 109,702 An 6,152 An Bulgaria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Bulgaria or Namibia?
Bulgaria, at 116,570 An against 114,187 An in Namibia as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Bulgaria and Namibia?
2,383 An, with Bulgaria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Namibia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Bulgaria and Namibia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Bulgaria ranks 155th and Namibia ranks 157th of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bulgaria vs Namibia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/bulgaria/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/bulgaria/namibia/">Bulgaria vs Namibia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,946 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.