Bangladesh vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered

Bangladesh
2.81 million An
in 2024
Zimbabwe
2.74 million An
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
32nd
Zimbabwe rank
33rd

Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Zimbabwe
01.0M2.0M3.0M196119922024

How they compare

Bangladesh currently reports 2.81 million An against 2.74 million An in Zimbabwe, a difference of 73,220 An.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 32nd and Zimbabwe ranks 33rd of 250 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 4 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 2.28 million An 338,600 An 1.94 million An Bangladesh
1970s 2.65 million An 606,780 An 2.04 million An Bangladesh
1980s 2.23 million An 453,570 An 1.78 million An Bangladesh
1990s 2.38 million An 2.39 million An 2,970 An Zimbabwe
2000s 2.58 million An 2.65 million An 69,808 An Zimbabwe
2010s 2.70 million An 2.75 million An 56,084 An Zimbabwe
2020s 2.77 million An 2.61 million An 169,006 An Bangladesh

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Bangladesh or Zimbabwe?
Bangladesh, at 2.81 million An against 2.74 million An in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Bangladesh and Zimbabwe?
73,220 An, with Bangladesh ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Zimbabwe?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Bangladesh and Zimbabwe rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Bangladesh ranks 32nd and Zimbabwe ranks 33rd of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/bangladesh/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/bangladesh/zimbabwe/">Bangladesh vs Zimbabwe: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,946 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.