Austria vs Romania: Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered

Austria
608,940 An
in 2024
Romania
561,440 An
in 2024
Austria rank
90th
Romania rank
93rd

Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered over time

  • Austria
  • Romania
500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M2.5M196119922024

How they compare

Austria currently reports 608,940 An against 561,440 An in Romania, a difference of 47,500 An.

That makes Austria's figure about 1.1 times Romania's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Romania ahead.

Austria ranks 90th and Romania ranks 93rd of 250 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 2 and Romania in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria Romania Difference Ahead
1960s 857,479 An 1.52 million An 664,588 An Romania
1970s 769,442 An 1.76 million An 987,558 An Romania
1980s 806,222 An 1.46 million An 651,378 An Romania
1990s 758,153 An 1.64 million An 879,593 An Romania
2000s 686,012 An 1.18 million An 495,316 An Romania
2010s 687,358 An 681,489 An 5,870 An Austria
2020s 631,446 An 602,350 An 29,096 An Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Austria or Romania?
Austria, at 608,940 An against 561,440 An in Romania as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Austria and Romania?
47,500 An, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Romania?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Austria and Romania rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Austria ranks 90th and Romania ranks 93rd of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs Romania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/austria/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/austria/romania/">Austria vs Romania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,946 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.