Australia vs Mexico: Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered

Australia
8.69 million An
in 2024
Mexico
8.92 million An
in 2024
Australia rank
11th
Mexico rank
10th

Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered over time

  • Australia
  • Mexico
2.5M5.0M7.5M10.0M12.5M196119922024

How they compare

Mexico currently reports 8.92 million An against 8.69 million An in Australia, a difference of 231,480 An.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 11th and Mexico ranks 10th of 250 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 6 and Mexico in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 5.76 million An 2.87 million An 2.89 million An Australia
1970s 8.89 million An 3.39 million An 5.50 million An Australia
1980s 8.02 million An 5.08 million An 2.94 million An Australia
1990s 8.48 million An 6.26 million An 2.22 million An Australia
2000s 8.75 million An 7.59 million An 1.16 million An Australia
2010s 8.68 million An 8.45 million An 231,214 An Australia
2020s 7.21 million An 8.67 million An 1.46 million An Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Australia or Mexico?
Mexico, at 8.92 million An against 8.69 million An in Australia as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Australia and Mexico?
231,480 An, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Mexico?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Australia and Mexico rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Australia ranks 11th and Mexico ranks 10th of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Mexico: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/australia/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/australia/mexico/">Australia vs Mexico: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,946 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.