Australia and New Zealand vs USSR: Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered

Australia and New Zealand
13.37 million An
in 2024
USSR
40.30 million An
in 1991
Australia and New Zealand rank
7th
USSR rank
4th

Edible offal of cattle: Producing Animals/Slaughtered over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • USSR
10.0M20.0M30.0M40.0M196119922024

How they compare

USSR currently reports 40.30 million An against 13.37 million An in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 26.93 million An.

That makes USSR's figure about 3.0 times Australia and New Zealand's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, USSR has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th and USSR ranks 4th of 250 countries.

USSR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand USSR Difference Ahead
1960s 8.33 million An 33.24 million An 24.92 million An USSR
1970s 12.17 million An 35.87 million An 23.70 million An USSR
1980s 11.04 million An 39.71 million An 28.67 million An USSR
1990s 10.94 million An 41.70 million An 30.76 million An USSR

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Australia and New Zealand or USSR?
USSR, at 40.30 million An against 13.37 million An in Australia and New Zealand as of 1991.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Australia and New Zealand and USSR?
26.93 million An, with USSR ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and USSR?
31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
How do Australia and New Zealand and USSR rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 7th and USSR ranks 4th of 250 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs USSR: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/australia-and-new-zealand/ussr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered/australia-and-new-zealand/ussr/">Australia and New Zealand vs USSR: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered
Unit
An
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
280 places, 15,946 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

This dataset provides annual statistics on crop and livestock production across countries and territories. For crops, data are provided on area harvested, production quantities and yields. For livestock, data are provided on animal stocks, numbers of producing and slaughtered animals, and the production of meat, milk, eggs and other livestock products. The dataset also includes information on production quantities for selected processed products, such as vegetable oils, sugar, fibres, beer, wine and major dairy products.