Sao Tome and Principe vs Palestine: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Sao Tome and Principe
0 An per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Palestine
0 An per US$ of GDP
in 2022
Sao Tome and Principe rank
96th
Palestine rank
94th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Sao Tome and Principe
  • Palestine
0000197019972024

How they compare

Palestine currently reports 0 An per US$ of GDP against 0 An per US$ of GDP in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0 An per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Palestine ahead.

Sao Tome and Principe ranks 96th and Palestine ranks 94th of 166 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Sao Tome and Principe averaged higher in 1 and Palestine in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sao Tome and Principe Palestine Difference Ahead
1990s 0 An per US$ of GDP 0 An per US$ of GDP 0 An per US$ of GDP Palestine
2000s 0 An per US$ of GDP 0 An per US$ of GDP 0 An per US$ of GDP Palestine
2010s 0 An per US$ of GDP 0 An per US$ of GDP 0 An per US$ of GDP Sao Tome and Principe
2020s 0 An per US$ of GDP 0 An per US$ of GDP 0 An per US$ of GDP Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Sao Tome and Principe or Palestine?
Palestine, at 0 An per US$ of GDP against 0 An per US$ of GDP in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2022.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Sao Tome and Principe and Palestine?
0 An per US$ of GDP, with Palestine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sao Tome and Principe and Palestine?
29 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2022.
How do Sao Tome and Principe and Palestine rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Sao Tome and Principe ranks 96th and Palestine ranks 94th of 166 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sao Tome and Principe vs Palestine: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-unit-of/sao-tome-and-principe/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-unit-of/sao-tome-and-principe/west-bank-and-gaza/">Sao Tome and Principe vs Palestine: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per unit of GDP
Unit
An per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
167 places, 9,070 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.