South Africa vs Ukraine: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

South Africa
2.6 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Ukraine
2.57 An per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa rank
76th
Ukraine rank
77th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • South Africa
  • Ukraine
051015196119922023

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 2.6 An per square kilometre against 2.57 An per square kilometre in Ukraine, a difference of 0.03 An per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ukraine ahead.

South Africa ranks 76th and Ukraine ranks 77th of 167 countries.

Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Ukraine Difference Ahead
1990s 2.05 An per square kilometre 13.29 An per square kilometre 11.24 An per square kilometre Ukraine
2000s 2.26 An per square kilometre 7.3 An per square kilometre 5.04 An per square kilometre Ukraine
2010s 2.67 An per square kilometre 4.17 An per square kilometre 1.51 An per square kilometre Ukraine
2020s 2.65 An per square kilometre 2.97 An per square kilometre 0.3126 An per square kilometre Ukraine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, South Africa or Ukraine?
South Africa, at 2.6 An per square kilometre against 2.57 An per square kilometre in Ukraine as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between South Africa and Ukraine?
0.03 An per square kilometre, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Ukraine?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do South Africa and Ukraine rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
South Africa ranks 76th and Ukraine ranks 77th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Ukraine: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/south-africa/ukraine/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/south-africa/ukraine/">South Africa vs Ukraine: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,559 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.