How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Romania?

18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Montenegro vs Romania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Montenegro

2.53 An per square kilometre

in 2023

Romania

2.55 An per square kilometre

in 2023

Montenegro rank

81st

Romania rank

79th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

Montenegro
Romania

How they compare

Romania currently reports 2.55 An per square kilometre against 2.53 An per square kilometre in Montenegro, a difference of 0.02 An per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Romania ahead.

Montenegro ranks 81st and Romania ranks 79th of 167 countries.

Romania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Montenegro	Romania	Difference	Ahead
2000s	2.12 An per square kilometre	4.76 An per square kilometre	2.64 An per square kilometre	Romania
2010s	1.75 An per square kilometre	2.96 An per square kilometre	1.21 An per square kilometre	Romania
2020s	2.36 An per square kilometre	2.66 An per square kilometre	0.2999 An per square kilometre	Romania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Montenegro or Romania?: Romania, at 2.55 An per square kilometre against 2.53 An per square kilometre in Montenegro as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Montenegro and Romania?: 0.02 An per square kilometre, with Romania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Romania?: 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Montenegro and Romania rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?: Montenegro ranks 81st and Romania ranks 79th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Montenegro vs Romania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/montenegro/romania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/montenegro/romania/">Montenegro vs Romania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit: An per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 168 places, 9,559 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.