Latvia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Latvia
1.37 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
1.32 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia rank
102nd
Trinidad and Tobago rank
104th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Latvia
  • Trinidad and Tobago
02.557.51012.5196119922023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 1.37 An per square kilometre against 1.32 An per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.05 An per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.

Latvia ranks 102nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 104th of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 3 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s 5.3 An per square kilometre 1.38 An per square kilometre 3.92 An per square kilometre Latvia
2000s 2.06 An per square kilometre 0.9999 An per square kilometre 1.06 An per square kilometre Latvia
2010s 1.58 An per square kilometre 1.32 An per square kilometre 0.2667 An per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 1.29 An per square kilometre 1.31 An per square kilometre 0.0157 An per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Latvia or Trinidad and Tobago?
Latvia, at 1.37 An per square kilometre against 1.32 An per square kilometre in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Latvia and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.05 An per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Trinidad and Tobago?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Latvia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Latvia ranks 102nd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 104th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/latvia/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/latvia/trinidad-and-tobago/">Latvia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,559 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.