Faroe Islands vs Mauritania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Faroe Islands
0.1993 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Mauritania
0.2373 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Faroe Islands rank
152nd
Mauritania rank
149th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Faroe Islands
  • Mauritania
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports 0.2373 An per square kilometre against 0.1993 An per square kilometre in Faroe Islands, a difference of 0.038 An per square kilometre.

That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.2 times Faroe Islands's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mauritania ahead.

Faroe Islands ranks 152nd and Mauritania ranks 149th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Faroe Islands averaged higher in 6 and Mauritania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Faroe Islands Mauritania Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1601 An per square kilometre 0.0995 An per square kilometre 0.0606 An per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1970s 0.3825 An per square kilometre 0.1027 An per square kilometre 0.2798 An per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1980s 0.4348 An per square kilometre 0.1224 An per square kilometre 0.3124 An per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1990s 0.4973 An per square kilometre 0.102 An per square kilometre 0.3953 An per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2000s 0.508 An per square kilometre 0.1945 An per square kilometre 0.3134 An per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2010s 0.4789 An per square kilometre 0.223 An per square kilometre 0.2559 An per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2020s 0.1906 An per square kilometre 0.2343 An per square kilometre 0.0436 An per square kilometre Mauritania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Faroe Islands or Mauritania?
Mauritania, at 0.2373 An per square kilometre against 0.1993 An per square kilometre in Faroe Islands as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Faroe Islands and Mauritania?
0.038 An per square kilometre, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Mauritania?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Faroe Islands and Mauritania rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Faroe Islands ranks 152nd and Mauritania ranks 149th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Faroe Islands vs Mauritania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/faroe-islands/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/faroe-islands/mauritania/">Faroe Islands vs Mauritania: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,559 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.