Costa Rica vs Palestine: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Costa Rica
7.37 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Palestine
7.75 An per square kilometre
in 2022
Costa Rica rank
28th
Palestine rank
25th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Palestine
24681012196119922023

How they compare

Palestine currently reports 7.75 An per square kilometre against 7.37 An per square kilometre in Costa Rica, a difference of 0.38 An per square kilometre.

That makes Palestine's figure about 1.1 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 28th and Palestine ranks 25th of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 3 and Palestine in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Palestine Difference Ahead
1990s 8.21 An per square kilometre 7.7 An per square kilometre 0.5164 An per square kilometre Costa Rica
2000s 6.73 An per square kilometre 4.96 An per square kilometre 1.77 An per square kilometre Costa Rica
2010s 7.32 An per square kilometre 5.76 An per square kilometre 1.56 An per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 7.72 An per square kilometre 8.34 An per square kilometre 0.619 An per square kilometre Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Costa Rica or Palestine?
Palestine, at 7.75 An per square kilometre against 7.37 An per square kilometre in Costa Rica as of 2022.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Costa Rica and Palestine?
0.38 An per square kilometre, with Palestine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Palestine?
29 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2022.
How do Costa Rica and Palestine rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Costa Rica ranks 28th and Palestine ranks 25th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Palestine: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/costa-rica/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/costa-rica/west-bank-and-gaza/">Costa Rica vs Palestine: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,559 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.