Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Indonesia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.7821 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Indonesia
0.7873 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
127th
Indonesia rank
124th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Indonesia
0123196119922023

How they compare

Indonesia currently reports 0.7873 An per square kilometre against 0.7821 An per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.0052 An per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 127th and Indonesia ranks 124th of 167 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Indonesia Difference Ahead
1990s 2.23 An per square kilometre 0.9064 An per square kilometre 1.33 An per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2000s 2.67 An per square kilometre 0.9166 An per square kilometre 1.76 An per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 1.87 An per square kilometre 1.06 An per square kilometre 0.8071 An per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 0.9332 An per square kilometre 0.8668 An per square kilometre 0.0664 An per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Indonesia?
Indonesia, at 0.7873 An per square kilometre against 0.7821 An per square kilometre in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Indonesia?
0.0052 An per square kilometre, with Indonesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Indonesia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Indonesia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 127th and Indonesia ranks 124th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Indonesia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/bosnia-and-herzegovina/indonesia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/bosnia-and-herzegovina/indonesia/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Indonesia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,559 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.