Belgium vs Israel: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Belgium
25.29 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Israel
22.29 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Belgium rank
2nd
Israel rank
3rd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Belgium
  • Israel
0102030196119922023

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 25.29 An per square kilometre against 22.29 An per square kilometre in Israel, a difference of 3 An per square kilometre.

That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.

Belgium ranks 2nd and Israel ranks 3rd of 167 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Israel Difference Ahead
2000s 27.68 An per square kilometre 11.93 An per square kilometre 15.75 An per square kilometre Belgium
2010s 28.28 An per square kilometre 17.78 An per square kilometre 10.5 An per square kilometre Belgium
2020s 25.22 An per square kilometre 21.4 An per square kilometre 3.82 An per square kilometre Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Belgium or Israel?
Belgium, at 25.29 An per square kilometre against 22.29 An per square kilometre in Israel as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Belgium and Israel?
3 An per square kilometre, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Israel?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belgium and Israel rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Belgium ranks 2nd and Israel ranks 3rd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Israel: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/belgium/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/belgium/israel/">Belgium vs Israel: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,559 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.