Barbados vs Sudan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Barbados
1.91 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Sudan
1.77 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
92nd
Sudan rank
95th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Barbados
  • Sudan
2.557.51012.5196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 1.91 An per square kilometre against 1.77 An per square kilometre in Sudan, a difference of 0.14 An per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.

Barbados ranks 92nd and Sudan ranks 95th of 167 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 1.86 An per square kilometre 1.82 An per square kilometre 0.031 An per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 2.01 An per square kilometre 1.82 An per square kilometre 0.1925 An per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Barbados or Sudan?
Barbados, at 1.91 An per square kilometre against 1.77 An per square kilometre in Sudan as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Barbados and Sudan?
0.14 An per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Sudan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Sudan rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Barbados ranks 92nd and Sudan ranks 95th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Sudan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/barbados/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/barbados/sudan/">Barbados vs Sudan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,559 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.