Antigua and Barbuda vs North Macedonia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Antigua and Barbuda
0.5659 An per square kilometre
in 2023
North Macedonia
0.4947 An per square kilometre
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
133rd
North Macedonia rank
136th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • North Macedonia
02468196119922023

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 0.5659 An per square kilometre against 0.4947 An per square kilometre in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.0712 An per square kilometre.

That makes Antigua and Barbuda's figure about 1.1 times North Macedonia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 133rd and North Macedonia ranks 136th of 167 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s 2.67 An per square kilometre 3 An per square kilometre 0.3364 An per square kilometre North Macedonia
2000s 2.12 An per square kilometre 2.47 An per square kilometre 0.3476 An per square kilometre North Macedonia
2010s 1.55 An per square kilometre 1.4 An per square kilometre 0.1548 An per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda
2020s 0.8063 An per square kilometre 0.6034 An per square kilometre 0.2029 An per square kilometre Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Antigua and Barbuda or North Macedonia?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 0.5659 An per square kilometre against 0.4947 An per square kilometre in North Macedonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Antigua and Barbuda and North Macedonia?
0.0712 An per square kilometre, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and North Macedonia?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and North Macedonia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 133rd and North Macedonia ranks 136th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs North Macedonia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/antigua-and-barbuda/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-square/antigua-and-barbuda/north-macedonia/">Antigua and Barbuda vs North Macedonia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per square kilometre
Unit
An per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,559 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.