Sudan vs Zambia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing
Sudan
0.0666 An per person
in 2024
Zambia
0.0645 An per person
in 2024
Sudan rank
33rd
Zambia rank
35th
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time
- Sudan
- Zambia
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 0.0666 An per person against 0.0645 An per person in Zambia, a difference of 0.0021 An per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Sudan ranks 33rd and Zambia ranks 35th of 167 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.0835 An per person | 0.0686 An per person | 0.0149 An per person | Sudan |
| 2020s | 0.0693 An per person | 0.0613 An per person | 0.008 An per person | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Sudan or Zambia?
- Sudan, at 0.0666 An per person against 0.0645 An per person in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Sudan and Zambia?
- 0.0021 An per person, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zambia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Sudan and Zambia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
- Sudan ranks 33rd and Zambia ranks 35th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.