New Zealand vs Uruguay: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

New Zealand
0.8852 An per person
in 2024
Uruguay
0.6751 An per person
in 2024
New Zealand rank
1st
Uruguay rank
2nd

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • New Zealand
  • Uruguay
0.40.60.811.2196119922024

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.8852 An per person against 0.6751 An per person in Uruguay, a difference of 0.2101 An per person.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.3 times Uruguay's.

Across all 64 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.

New Zealand ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 2nd of 167 countries.

New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Uruguay Difference Ahead
1960s 0.9803 An per person 0.5264 An per person 0.4538 An per person New Zealand
1970s 1.09 An per person 0.5578 An per person 0.5313 An per person New Zealand
1980s 0.9393 An per person 0.5674 An per person 0.3719 An per person New Zealand
1990s 0.8908 An per person 0.5161 An per person 0.3747 An per person New Zealand
2000s 0.9053 An per person 0.6332 An per person 0.2721 An per person New Zealand
2010s 0.9257 An per person 0.6499 An per person 0.2758 An per person New Zealand
2020s 0.9041 An per person 0.6794 An per person 0.2247 An per person New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, New Zealand or Uruguay?
New Zealand, at 0.8852 An per person against 0.6751 An per person in Uruguay as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between New Zealand and Uruguay?
0.2101 An per person, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Uruguay?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do New Zealand and Uruguay rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
New Zealand ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 2nd of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Uruguay: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-capita/new-zealand/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-capita/new-zealand/uruguay/">New Zealand vs Uruguay: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita
Unit
An per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,723 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.