Finland vs New Caledonia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Finland
0.047 An per person
in 2024
New Caledonia
0.0458 An per person
in 2024
Finland rank
52nd
New Caledonia rank
54th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Finland
  • New Caledonia
0.050.10.150.20.25196119922024

How they compare

Finland currently reports 0.047 An per person against 0.0458 An per person in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.0012 An per person.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Finland ranks 52nd and New Caledonia ranks 54th of 167 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 3 and New Caledonia in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2102 An per person 0.2058 An per person 0.0044 An per person Finland
1970s 0.1595 An per person 0.1376 An per person 0.022 An per person Finland
1980s 0.1242 An per person 0.0961 An per person 0.0282 An per person Finland
1990s 0.0858 An per person 0.1072 An per person 0.0214 An per person New Caledonia
2000s 0.0609 An per person 0.0809 An per person 0.02 An per person New Caledonia
2010s 0.0505 An per person 0.0605 An per person 0.0101 An per person New Caledonia
2020s 0.0472 An per person 0.0489 An per person 0.0017 An per person New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Finland or New Caledonia?
Finland, at 0.047 An per person against 0.0458 An per person in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Finland and New Caledonia?
0.0012 An per person, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and New Caledonia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Finland and New Caledonia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Finland ranks 52nd and New Caledonia ranks 54th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs New Caledonia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-capita/finland/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-capita/finland/new-caledonia/">Finland vs New Caledonia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita
Unit
An per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,723 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.