Congo vs Saudi Arabia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Congo
0.0056 An per person
in 2024
Saudi Arabia
0.0057 An per person
in 2024
Congo rank
141st
Saudi Arabia rank
140th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Congo
  • Saudi Arabia
00.0050.010.0150.020.025196119922024

How they compare

Saudi Arabia currently reports 0.0057 An per person against 0.0056 An per person in Congo, a difference of 0.0001 An per person.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Congo ranks 141st and Saudi Arabia ranks 140th of 167 countries.

Saudi Arabia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0035 An per person 0.0159 An per person 0.0124 An per person Saudi Arabia
1970s 0.006 An per person 0.0202 An per person 0.0142 An per person Saudi Arabia
1980s 0.0063 An per person 0.0175 An per person 0.0113 An per person Saudi Arabia
1990s 0.0033 An per person 0.0099 An per person 0.0066 An per person Saudi Arabia
2000s 0.006 An per person 0.0064 An per person 0.0004 An per person Saudi Arabia
2010s 0.0077 An per person 0.0081 An per person 0.0004 An per person Saudi Arabia
2020s 0.006 An per person 0.0061 An per person 0.0001 An per person Saudi Arabia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Congo or Saudi Arabia?
Saudi Arabia, at 0.0057 An per person against 0.0056 An per person in Congo as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Congo and Saudi Arabia?
0.0001 An per person, with Saudi Arabia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Saudi Arabia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Congo and Saudi Arabia rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Congo ranks 141st and Saudi Arabia ranks 140th of 167 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Saudi Arabia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-capita/congo-rep/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-per-capita/congo-rep/saudi-arabia/">Congo vs Saudi Arabia: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, per capita
Unit
An per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 9,723 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.