Nepal vs Spain: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Nepal
1.26 % change on previous year
in 1990
Spain
1.35 % change on previous year
in 2024
Nepal rank
71st
Spain rank
68th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Nepal
  • Spain
-20020196219932024

How they compare

Spain currently reports 1.35 % change on previous year against 1.26 % change on previous year in Nepal, a difference of 0.09 % change on previous year.

That makes Spain's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Nepal ahead.

Nepal ranks 71st and Spain ranks 68th of 209 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 1 and Spain in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal Spain Difference Ahead
1960s 2.78 % change on previous year 3.41 % change on previous year 0.6289 % change on previous year Spain
1970s 2.59 % change on previous year 2.07 % change on previous year 0.5165 % change on previous year Nepal
1980s 0.2692 % change on previous year 0.7245 % change on previous year 0.4553 % change on previous year Spain
1990s 1.26 % change on previous year 11.13 % change on previous year 9.88 % change on previous year Spain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Nepal or Spain?
Spain, at 1.35 % change on previous year against 1.26 % change on previous year in Nepal as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Nepal and Spain?
0.09 % change on previous year, with Spain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Spain?
29 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1990.
How do Nepal and Spain rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Nepal ranks 71st and Spain ranks 68th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs Spain: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-annual/nepal/spain/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-annual/nepal/spain/">Nepal vs Spain: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,580 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.