Malta vs South Sudan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Malta
1.77 % change on previous year
in 2024
South Sudan
1.87 % change on previous year
in 2024
Malta rank
60th
South Sudan rank
59th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Malta
  • South Sudan
-40-20020196219932024

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 1.87 % change on previous year against 1.77 % change on previous year in Malta, a difference of 0.1 % change on previous year.

That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2013 it was South Sudan ahead.

Malta ranks 60th and South Sudan ranks 59th of 209 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta South Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s -1.24 % change on previous year 9.13 % change on previous year 10.38 % change on previous year South Sudan
2020s 1.91 % change on previous year -0.9881 % change on previous year 2.89 % change on previous year Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Malta or South Sudan?
South Sudan, at 1.87 % change on previous year against 1.77 % change on previous year in Malta as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Malta and South Sudan?
0.1 % change on previous year, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and South Sudan?
12 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2024.
How do Malta and South Sudan rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Malta ranks 60th and South Sudan ranks 59th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs South Sudan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-annual/malta/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-annual/malta/south-sudan/">Malta vs South Sudan: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,580 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.