Kuwait vs Nepal: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Kuwait
1.31 % change on previous year
in 2024
Nepal
1.26 % change on previous year
in 1990
Kuwait rank
70th
Nepal rank
71st

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Kuwait
  • Nepal
-1000100200196219932024

How they compare

Kuwait currently reports 1.31 % change on previous year against 1.26 % change on previous year in Nepal, a difference of 0.05 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Kuwait ahead.

Kuwait ranks 70th and Nepal ranks 71st of 209 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kuwait averaged higher in 3 and Nepal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kuwait Nepal Difference Ahead
1960s 9.74 % change on previous year 2.78 % change on previous year 6.96 % change on previous year Kuwait
1970s 23.25 % change on previous year 2.59 % change on previous year 20.66 % change on previous year Kuwait
1980s 1.01 % change on previous year 0.2692 % change on previous year 0.7423 % change on previous year Kuwait
1990s -13.27 % change on previous year 1.26 % change on previous year 14.52 % change on previous year Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Kuwait or Nepal?
Kuwait, at 1.31 % change on previous year against 1.26 % change on previous year in Nepal as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Kuwait and Nepal?
0.05 % change on previous year, with Kuwait ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Nepal?
29 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 1990.
How do Kuwait and Nepal rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Kuwait ranks 70th and Nepal ranks 71st of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kuwait vs Nepal: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-annual/kuwait/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-annual/kuwait/nepal/">Kuwait vs Nepal: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,580 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.