Georgia vs Kenya: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing

Georgia
17.62 % change on previous year
in 2024
Kenya
17.88 % change on previous year
in 2024
Georgia rank
9th
Kenya rank
8th

Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing over time

  • Georgia
  • Kenya
-40-2002040196219932024

How they compare

Kenya currently reports 17.88 % change on previous year against 17.62 % change on previous year in Georgia, a difference of 0.26 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 9th and Kenya ranks 8th of 209 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Kenya in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Kenya Difference Ahead
1990s 1.63 % change on previous year 5.53 % change on previous year 3.89 % change on previous year Kenya
2000s 4.93 % change on previous year -1.09 % change on previous year 6.03 % change on previous year Georgia
2010s -3.59 % change on previous year 4.29 % change on previous year 7.88 % change on previous year Kenya
2020s 7.3 % change on previous year -4.08 % change on previous year 11.39 % change on previous year Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing, Georgia or Kenya?
Kenya, at 17.88 % change on previous year against 17.62 % change on previous year in Georgia as of 2024.
What is the difference in edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing between Georgia and Kenya?
0.26 % change on previous year, with Kenya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Kenya?
32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
How do Georgia and Kenya rank globally for edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — producing?
Georgia ranks 9th and Kenya ranks 8th of 209 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Kenya: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-annual/georgia/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/edible-offal-of-cattle-fresh-chilled-or-frozen-producing-animals-slaughtered-annual/georgia/kenya/">Georgia vs Kenya: Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
239 places, 13,580 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Edible offal of cattle, fresh, chilled or frozen — Producing Animals/Slaughtered. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.