Malta vs Turkmenistan: Deforestation driven by agricultural expansion and forest plantations
Malta
0.13
in 2017
Turkmenistan
0.3
in 2014
Malta rank
166th
Turkmenistan rank
163rd
Deforestation driven by agricultural expansion and forest plantations over time
- Malta
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 0.3 against 0.13 in Malta, a difference of 0.17.
That makes Turkmenistan's figure about 2.3 times Malta's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Turkmenistan has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 166th and Turkmenistan ranks 163rd of 176 countries.
Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.9675 | 13.27 | 12.3 | Turkmenistan |
| 2010s | 0.405 | 5.46 | 5.06 | Turkmenistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher deforestation driven by agricultural expansion and forest plantations, Malta or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 0.3 against 0.13 in Malta as of 2014.
- What is the difference in deforestation driven by agricultural expansion and forest plantations between Malta and Turkmenistan?
- 0.17, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Turkmenistan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2013.
- How do Malta and Turkmenistan rank globally for deforestation driven by agricultural expansion and forest plantations?
- Malta ranks 166th and Turkmenistan ranks 163rd of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Singh et al. (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Deforestation driven by agricultural expansion and forest plantations. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The estimated area deforested to clear land for agricultural production or forest plantations. This is measured in hectares.