Comoros vs Malawi: Daily meat consumption per person
Comoros
72.85 grams per day per capita
in 2023
Malawi
77.34 grams per day per capita
in 2023
Comoros rank
141st
Malawi rank
138th
Daily meat consumption per person over time
- Comoros
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 77.34 grams per day per capita against 72.85 grams per day per capita in Comoros, a difference of 4.49 grams per day per capita.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Comoros's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Comoros ahead.
Comoros ranks 141st and Malawi ranks 138th of 192 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 56.4 grams per day per capita | 47.05 grams per day per capita | 9.35 grams per day per capita | Comoros |
| 2020s | 76.71 grams per day per capita | 79.46 grams per day per capita | 2.75 grams per day per capita | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher daily meat consumption per person, Comoros or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 77.34 grams per day per capita against 72.85 grams per day per capita in Comoros as of 2023.
- What is the difference in daily meat consumption per person between Comoros and Malawi?
- 4.49 grams per day per capita, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Malawi?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Comoros and Malawi rank globally for daily meat consumption per person?
- Comoros ranks 141st and Malawi ranks 138th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Daily meat consumption per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.