Botswana vs Libya: Daily meat consumption per person
Botswana
118.55 grams per day per capita
in 2023
Libya
119.67 grams per day per capita
in 2023
Botswana rank
116th
Libya rank
115th
Daily meat consumption per person over time
- Botswana
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 119.67 grams per day per capita against 118.55 grams per day per capita in Botswana, a difference of 1.12 grams per day per capita.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Libya ahead.
Botswana ranks 116th and Libya ranks 115th of 191 countries.
Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 72.11 grams per day per capita | 105.87 grams per day per capita | 33.76 grams per day per capita | Libya |
| 2020s | 111.57 grams per day per capita | 120.21 grams per day per capita | 8.64 grams per day per capita | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher daily meat consumption per person, Botswana or Libya?
- Libya, at 119.67 grams per day per capita against 118.55 grams per day per capita in Botswana as of 2023.
- What is the difference in daily meat consumption per person between Botswana and Libya?
- 1.12 grams per day per capita, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Libya?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Botswana and Libya rank globally for daily meat consumption per person?
- Botswana ranks 116th and Libya ranks 115th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Daily meat consumption per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.