New Caledonia vs New Zealand: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per

New Caledonia
0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
in 2024
New Zealand
0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
in 2024
New Caledonia rank
106th
New Zealand rank
103rd

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per over time

  • New Caledonia
  • New Zealand
000.0010.0010.001196119922024

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1965 it was New Caledonia ahead.

New Caledonia ranks 106th and New Zealand ranks 103rd of 140 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, New Caledonia averaged higher in 3 and New Zealand in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Caledonia New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0008 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0.0007 1000 USD per US$ of GDP New Caledonia
1970s 0.0002 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP New Caledonia
1980s 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP New Caledonia
1990s 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP New Zealand
2000s 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP New Zealand
2010s 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP New Zealand
2020s 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per, New Caledonia or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per between New Caledonia and New Zealand?
0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and New Zealand?
60 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2024.
How do New Caledonia and New Zealand rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per?
New Caledonia ranks 106th and New Zealand ranks 103rd of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Caledonia vs New Zealand: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/new-caledonia/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/new-caledonia/new-zealand/">New Caledonia vs New Zealand: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,599 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.