How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and New Caledonia?

45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Namibia vs New Caledonia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per

Namibia

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

New Caledonia

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Namibia rank

104th

New Caledonia rank

106th

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per over time

Namibia
New Caledonia

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times New Caledonia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 45 shared years of data; in 1980 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Namibia ranks 104th and New Caledonia ranks 106th of 140 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 3 and New Caledonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Namibia	New Caledonia	Difference	Ahead
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	New Caledonia
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	New Caledonia
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Namibia
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Namibia
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per, Namibia or New Caledonia?: Namibia, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in New Caledonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per between Namibia and New Caledonia?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and New Caledonia?: 45 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
How do Namibia and New Caledonia rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per?: Namibia ranks 104th and New Caledonia ranks 106th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs New Caledonia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/namibia/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/namibia/new-caledonia/">Namibia vs New Caledonia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 141 places, 7,599 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.