How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Estonia?

32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Equatorial Guinea vs Estonia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per

Equatorial Guinea

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Estonia

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Equatorial Guinea rank

109th

Estonia rank

112th

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per over time

Equatorial Guinea
Estonia

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Estonia, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.3 times Estonia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 109th and Estonia ranks 112th of 140 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Estonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Equatorial Guinea	Estonia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0004 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0004 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Equatorial Guinea
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Equatorial Guinea
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Estonia
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per, Equatorial Guinea or Estonia?: Equatorial Guinea, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Estonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per between Equatorial Guinea and Estonia?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Estonia?: 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Estonia rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per?: Equatorial Guinea ranks 109th and Estonia ranks 112th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Estonia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/equatorial-guinea/estonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/equatorial-guinea/estonia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Estonia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 141 places, 7,599 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.