Iceland vs Namibia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per

Iceland
0.2692 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.2192 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
137th
Namibia rank
139th

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per over time

  • Iceland
  • Namibia
0.050.10.150.20.250.3196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0.2692 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.2192 1000 USD per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.05 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 137th and Namibia ranks 139th of 140 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0958 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0577 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.038 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 0.1054 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.07 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0354 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 0.1635 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0831 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0805 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0.1835 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1015 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.082 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0.2489 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1547 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0942 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0.2682 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1906 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0776 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 0.2664 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2278 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0387 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per, Iceland or Namibia?
Iceland, at 0.2692 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.2192 1000 USD per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per between Iceland and Namibia?
0.05 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Namibia rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per?
Iceland ranks 137th and Namibia ranks 139th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Namibia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/iceland/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/iceland/namibia/">Iceland vs Namibia: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,941 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.