Guinea-Bissau vs Poland: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per

Guinea-Bissau
38.7 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Poland
38.78 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
48th
Poland rank
47th

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Poland
10203040196119922023

How they compare

Poland currently reports 38.78 1000 USD per square kilometre against 38.7 1000 USD per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.08 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Poland ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 48th and Poland ranks 47th of 140 countries.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Poland Difference Ahead
1960s 14.14 1000 USD per square kilometre 31.52 1000 USD per square kilometre 17.38 1000 USD per square kilometre Poland
1970s 13.73 1000 USD per square kilometre 35.88 1000 USD per square kilometre 22.15 1000 USD per square kilometre Poland
1980s 18.83 1000 USD per square kilometre 35.55 1000 USD per square kilometre 16.72 1000 USD per square kilometre Poland
1990s 24.05 1000 USD per square kilometre 36.56 1000 USD per square kilometre 12.51 1000 USD per square kilometre Poland
2000s 28.42 1000 USD per square kilometre 32.3 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.88 1000 USD per square kilometre Poland
2010s 32.89 1000 USD per square kilometre 34.32 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.44 1000 USD per square kilometre Poland
2020s 37.97 1000 USD per square kilometre 38.59 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.627 1000 USD per square kilometre Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per, Guinea-Bissau or Poland?
Poland, at 38.78 1000 USD per square kilometre against 38.7 1000 USD per square kilometre in Guinea-Bissau as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per between Guinea-Bissau and Poland?
0.08 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Poland?
56 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Poland rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 48th and Poland ranks 47th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Poland: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/poland/">Guinea-Bissau vs Poland: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,941 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.