Gambia vs Mozambique: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per

Gambia
8.42 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique
8.22 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia rank
103rd
Mozambique rank
106th

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per over time

  • Gambia
  • Mozambique
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 8.42 1000 USD per square kilometre against 8.22 1000 USD per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 0.2 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Gambia ahead.

Gambia ranks 103rd and Mozambique ranks 106th of 140 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 6 and Mozambique in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Mozambique Difference Ahead
1960s 8.96 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.56 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.39 1000 USD per square kilometre Gambia
1970s 8.68 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.86 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.82 1000 USD per square kilometre Gambia
1980s 9.05 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.87 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.19 1000 USD per square kilometre Gambia
1990s 8.71 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.6 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.11 1000 USD per square kilometre Gambia
2000s 14.26 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.89 1000 USD per square kilometre 10.37 1000 USD per square kilometre Gambia
2010s 12.44 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.45 1000 USD per square kilometre 7 1000 USD per square kilometre Gambia
2020s 7.91 1000 USD per square kilometre 8.11 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1984 1000 USD per square kilometre Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per, Gambia or Mozambique?
Gambia, at 8.42 1000 USD per square kilometre against 8.22 1000 USD per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per between Gambia and Mozambique?
0.2 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Mozambique?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Gambia and Mozambique rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per?
Gambia ranks 103rd and Mozambique ranks 106th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Mozambique: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/gambia-the/mozambique/">Gambia vs Mozambique: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,941 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.