China vs Jamaica: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per

China
108.52 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Jamaica
116.5 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
China rank
13th
Jamaica rank
10th

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per over time

  • China
  • Jamaica
255075100125196119922023

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 116.5 1000 USD per square kilometre against 108.52 1000 USD per square kilometre in China, a difference of 7.98 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Jamaica's figure about 1.1 times China's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jamaica ahead.

China ranks 13th and Jamaica ranks 10th of 140 countries.

Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Jamaica Difference Ahead
1960s 16.68 1000 USD per square kilometre 74.76 1000 USD per square kilometre 58.08 1000 USD per square kilometre Jamaica
1970s 22.6 1000 USD per square kilometre 79.46 1000 USD per square kilometre 56.86 1000 USD per square kilometre Jamaica
1980s 32.63 1000 USD per square kilometre 80.8 1000 USD per square kilometre 48.17 1000 USD per square kilometre Jamaica
1990s 48.25 1000 USD per square kilometre 111.33 1000 USD per square kilometre 63.08 1000 USD per square kilometre Jamaica
2000s 69.05 1000 USD per square kilometre 100.99 1000 USD per square kilometre 31.95 1000 USD per square kilometre Jamaica
2010s 94.22 1000 USD per square kilometre 102.49 1000 USD per square kilometre 8.27 1000 USD per square kilometre Jamaica
2020s 106.01 1000 USD per square kilometre 114.57 1000 USD per square kilometre 8.55 1000 USD per square kilometre Jamaica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per, China or Jamaica?
Jamaica, at 116.5 1000 USD per square kilometre against 108.52 1000 USD per square kilometre in China as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per between China and Jamaica?
7.98 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Jamaica?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do China and Jamaica rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per?
China ranks 13th and Jamaica ranks 10th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Jamaica: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/china/jamaica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/china/jamaica/">China vs Jamaica: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,941 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.