How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Kazakhstan?

25 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chad vs Kazakhstan: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per

Chad

2.18 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Kazakhstan

2.23 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Chad rank

132nd

Kazakhstan rank

131st

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per over time

Chad
Kazakhstan

How they compare

Kazakhstan currently reports 2.23 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.18 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 0.05 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 132nd and Kazakhstan ranks 131st of 140 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 2 and Kazakhstan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chad	Kazakhstan	Difference	Ahead
1990s	1.26 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.16 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.1046 1000 USD per square kilometre	Chad
2000s	1.36 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.51 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.1476 1000 USD per square kilometre	Kazakhstan
2010s	2.17 1000 USD per square kilometre	1.99 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.1752 1000 USD per square kilometre	Chad
2020s	2.24 1000 USD per square kilometre	2.35 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.1067 1000 USD per square kilometre	Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per, Chad or Kazakhstan?: Kazakhstan, at 2.23 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.18 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per between Chad and Kazakhstan?: 0.05 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Kazakhstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Kazakhstan?: 25 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2023.
How do Chad and Kazakhstan rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per?: Chad ranks 132nd and Kazakhstan ranks 131st of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Kazakhstan: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/chad/kazakhstan/">Chad vs Kazakhstan: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 141 places, 7,941 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 24 September 2026

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.