Burundi vs Malawi: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per

Burundi
92.49 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Malawi
104.8 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Burundi rank
17th
Malawi rank
14th

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per over time

  • Burundi
  • Malawi
020406080100196119922023

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 104.8 1000 USD per square kilometre against 92.49 1000 USD per square kilometre in Burundi, a difference of 12.31 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Burundi's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 58 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Burundi ahead.

Burundi ranks 17th and Malawi ranks 14th of 140 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 5 and Malawi in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burundi Malawi Difference Ahead
1960s 31.77 1000 USD per square kilometre 7.27 1000 USD per square kilometre 24.5 1000 USD per square kilometre Burundi
1970s 35.28 1000 USD per square kilometre 11.17 1000 USD per square kilometre 24.1 1000 USD per square kilometre Burundi
1980s 42.61 1000 USD per square kilometre 12.85 1000 USD per square kilometre 29.76 1000 USD per square kilometre Burundi
1990s 46.73 1000 USD per square kilometre 20.77 1000 USD per square kilometre 25.96 1000 USD per square kilometre Burundi
2000s 51.84 1000 USD per square kilometre 40.86 1000 USD per square kilometre 10.98 1000 USD per square kilometre Burundi
2010s 71.74 1000 USD per square kilometre 75.8 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.06 1000 USD per square kilometre Malawi
2020s 93.68 1000 USD per square kilometre 102.98 1000 USD per square kilometre 9.29 1000 USD per square kilometre Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per, Burundi or Malawi?
Malawi, at 104.8 1000 USD per square kilometre against 92.49 1000 USD per square kilometre in Burundi as of 2023.
What is the difference in crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per between Burundi and Malawi?
12.31 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Malawi?
58 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Burundi and Malawi rank globally for crops — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand us$), per?
Burundi ranks 17th and Malawi ranks 14th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Malawi: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 24 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/burundi/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/crops-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square-kilometre/burundi/malawi/">Burundi vs Malawi: Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,941 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Crops — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.